HOMEABOUTCONTACTPRESSARCHIVESBADGESTWITTER





April 15, 2009

DadCentric Gets A Facelift

Dear Readers: over the next couple of weeks, the good people at Sweet Blog are going to be working their magic and giving this site a much-needed overhaul. So if things look weird/wonky, don't panic and don't email us; it's all part of the Master Plan. Like the one the Cylons had. Only ours is going to make sense and have a resolution that unlike Battlestar: Galactica's will be awesome and not completely suck. (FUCK I am still angry about that last episode. Need to let it go. But can't.)


And speaking of magic, please welcome our newest contributor, the eye and brain behind Pacing The Panic Room, Ryan Marshall. He'll be posting his words and pictures, and will add some class to the joint. And because we are a classy operation, here is a video reminding soccer dads and moms that soccer is really an incredibly dangerous sport which should require a helmet.


March 16, 2009

(clearing throat nervously)

So. Hey! Hi. Yes, it's me. The stupidly named TwoBusy. The newest member of Team America (fuck yeah!) and/or DadCentric. I just moved here, and I was wondering if I could sit with you guys at lunch?

Continue reading "(clearing throat nervously)" »

November 14, 2008

Special Guest Dad: Paul Nyhan

Pick up your local paper, and chances are that at least once a week you'll see an article about parenting. And of course it'll be written by someone other than a father. But if you're a dad living in Seattle, not only do you get a government-paid-for Starbucks ration, the opportunity to hire Alice in Chains to play your kid's birthday party, and an unbridled all-consuming hatred for Clay Bennett and David Stern, you get DadSeattle. DadSeattle is brought to you by the forward-thinking folks at the Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Contributing to the P-I and DadSeattle is Paul Nyhan, who's a three-time dad and a great writer to boot. He writes the P-I's Working Dad blog, and here's his latest. It's well worth your time and I'm not just saying that because I'm quoted in the piece, unless you're my parents because they're so proud of me that I'm in the newspapers.

June 19, 2008

Special Guest Dad: Kevin McKeever

We continue our Special Guest Dad series with this contribution from reader Kevin McKeever. Kevin describes himself as "a recovering journalist, corporate-chaos survivor and former full-time telecommuter." He's a WAHD; you can read his work-related stuff here, and his everything-else-related stuff here. In this piece, Kevin considers the American Girl Phenomenon, which, frankly, I know nothing about, but probably should, since I have a daughter who may end up liking dolls and Louisa May Alcott books and such.

You go, American Girl. Go, now.

Nothing says "female empowerment" quite like women using capitalism to cash in on female empowerment.

I have seen it up close, dear friend. It is called the American Girl doll/book/movie phenomenon.

For those without little girls or good credit lines, American Girl dolls were created by a mid-Western woman who wanted better role models for girls than the bodacious airline hostess Barbie dolls of her day.

She succeeded. She succeeded so well, she sold the company in 1998 for $700 million … to Barbie's maker, Mattel. Now, the woman, Pleasant Rowland, is taking her money and essentially remaking Aurora, N.Y., in her own American Girl image, much to the displeasure of some of the natives.

Conceptually, I have no problem with AG. The dolls all have historical, fill-the-world-with-love-and-goodness backstories (Slave girl helps with the Underground Railroad! Hippie chick saves bald eagles!) supported through books, videos and a soon-to-be-released Major Motion Picture.

Values, character, etc. - I'm down with that. Beats Bratz and their "passion for fashion."

But, being in the Land of the Free Enterprise System, they tie all that wholesomeness into selling you not just the dolls at 90 bucks a pop but also the doll's accessories (Own the slave girl doll's bird in a cage for $18! Buy the hippie chick doll's picnic gear for camping out to watch bald eagles for $48!). Don't forget life-size clothes for your girl that look like the dolls' clothes.

And, your precious girl needs them ALL!

I'll give AG props for chutzpah and quality. The stuff they shill is definitely more substantial in terms of size and material than say those flimsy, teeny Polly Pocket toys my daughter was into for a while. I still occasionally find them under furniture or in the dog's digestive remains.

Well, in April, me and the 8-year-old took a day trip to Chicago for her quarterly appointment with the juvenile dermatomyositis specialist (she's doing very well, thanks for asking). As part of our appointments, we always visit the American Girl Place there. It's her reward for enduring all the blood draws, pills, injections, nights in traction boots to stretch her ankle muscles and periodic medical procedures over the past six years. They should make an American Girl doll out of her, for crying out loud.

So, there she is, skipping up the "Miracle Mile" of Chicago's glitzy Michigan Avenue shopping district. Arms swaying, safari hat perched on her head, a blissful blur in pink and white stripes that only stops to ask how many more blocks 'til we get there.

We arrive five minute before the store opens. She's looking at the window displays, telling me what she likes and doesn't like.

Now, she's detailing exactly what three things she wants. She knows because she has pored through the AG catalog (which seems to arrive weekly in our mailbox), made thick colored marker circles around 85 percent of the items, and then narrowed it down to a Holy Trinity of American Girlness. This is because she knows that while I am a sucker, I am a sucker with financial limitations.

"I added it up with the calculator," she exclaims, "and they only cost $126!"

Hey, math skills being learned here. American Girl is THAT good!

It's now 10 a.m. on the dot. A man in a navy blue custodial uniform unlocks the door. "Come on in," he says.

The AG store in Chicago is three floors of red, pink and purple pre-teen paradise (add green if you own stock in Mattel, of course). Being a Wednesday morning, this is the first time I've been in the place without it being wall-to-wall girls dressed just like the AG dolls they are cradling in their arms.

There was also no snaking queue of moms waiting to pay an AG stylist $20 to give a ponytail-flip-with-braid 'do to their princesses' "Just Like You" doll. The café was silent, waiting for parent-child bonding over afternoon tea at $17 a head.

Then I saw a fellow Dad. He asked a saleswoman if they sold Girl Scout uniforms for the dolls.

No, she said, but the closest thing would be this doll's summer camp outfit. Then you could get the camp tent and backpack and camping accessories …

I now know exactly what that vacant, dead man's stare of helplessness looks like that I give my wife every time she tells me about the latest home improvement idea she got from watching HGTV.

So, $137.66 later (note: must teach girl about sales tax), we were on our way. But first, I needed to make a pit stop.

I stopped a male security guard walking past me on the basement level. "I see the big 'Women's Restroom' sign," I said, pointing out the obvious in front of us, "but where is the men's room?"

His eyes rolled.

"You're not going to like this," he sighed. "Two floors up, in the back, tucked around a corner from the customer service desk."

"We all complain about it," he then added. By "we," he was obviously referring to only the other male members of the store staff. You could tell.

"Well, I'm sure they are fixing that when you move to the new, bigger store across the street this fall," I said.

"Oh, no," he said. "Same location in the store. But it's a bigger store and a longer walk. We all fought for that one, but it's not happening."

I guess it's true. Payback is a bitch.

May 22, 2008

Special Guest Dad: Christopher Harder

Since this is an election year, I thought I'd spread a little democracy to the freedom-starved peoples of DadCentric. From time to time, we'll be featuring posts by contributing Guest Dads (and yes, I'm looking for submissions, so feel free to send 'em to petcobra@gmail.com). I'm pleased to present the following from Christopher Harder. Chris is a veteran journalist who left his job as an editor at the Wall Street Journal's website to join the ranks of the stay-at-home-dads. Here's his take on the current presidential hopefuls, and how the Youth Vote in his home has swayed his opinion...

A Diaper Change We Can Believe In
by Christopher Harder

Rumor has it there’s a presidential campaign going on.

It looks like it’s getting pretty interesting, too. Only three major candidates are left, and even they might get whittled down to two soon. That means no more of those pesky minor candidates gumming up the debates.

It also means the campaign will be easier for me to follow. I used to make a living covering the news. Now I stay home all day caring for my two-and-a-half-year-old son, Nicholas. I change diapers, do laundry, make meals and treat illnesses. I’m lucky if I can glance at a couple of newspapers and hear the radio news roundup over my son’s pleas to play with him.

I don’t watch the evening news because that’s bath time. I don’t watch the late news because I’m usually in bed exhausted by 10. Sometimes I watch a campaign video on YouTube during Nicholas’s naptime, but nothing longer than a sound bite.

Still, I care about the election. Now that my life revolves around my son, I care most about family issues. The economy and the Iraq war may be grabbing the headlines, but where do the candidates stand on family leave and work flexibility?

I headed to their Web sites to find out. Hey, it’s quicker than sitting through the debates.

Hillary Clinton’s homepage has a section called “Supporting Parents and Caring for Children.” That has a nice ring to it. Barack Obama has a section titled “Family.” It sounds like he cares. John McCain has a “Human Dignity” section – a bit vague.

They all have commendable things to say. Clinton’s Web site mentions stay-at-home parents. I like that. She wants to offer grants to allow them to stay at home. She also mentions fathers. I like that, too. She says they shouldn’t be fired for taking care of their children. Obama wants to help states set up paid family-leave programs, and he supports flexibility in telecommuting and working part-time. Sounds good. McCain discusses noble concepts such as the importance of the family in strengthening communities.

I still couldn’t decide who made the most sense. Then I realized my most valuable adviser was right next to me in the booster seat. Nicholas would be “the decider.” He always manages to pick up on two particular words when he hears them during radio newscasts:

“That man said ‘Barack Obama,’” Nicholas says each time he hears the name. He’s a toddler who’s made up his mind about the election, even if his key issue is that “Barack Obama” is more fun to say than “Hillary Clinton” or “John McCain.”

Maybe Nicholas isn’t so different from many people who are actually old enough to vote. I wonder how many simply don’t have the time to follow a campaign closely, and ultimately decide based on a gut feeling -- or a candidate’s name. This may be especially true in a contest where the names Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama have stirred up such emotions.

As for me, it’s time to change another diaper. Now there’s a change I can believe in.